Comparison · Build vs. buy
The in-house SDR question, answered with the numbers nobody puts in the job req. We sell the alternative, so check our math: price your exact scenario in the CFO Cost Model.
They scaled the old playbook. We changed the play.
Build in-house if you have SDR management muscle, a recruiting engine, and a two-year horizon. Buy the outcome if you want qualified meetings in weeks, at roughly a third of the cost of one $154K fully loaded seat, with the data, tooling, and people problems owned by someone else.
Neither answer is wrong. But one of them is usually wrong for you, and the deciding factors are knowable in advance: how fast you need meetings, whether managing a sales team is a muscle you already have, and whether becoming good at sales development is worth two years of tuition.
Build · in-house
Buy · the program
Bottom line: an in-house SDR runs about $154K a year per seat, with roughly 34–40% turnover and 4 to 7 months to the first qualified meeting. An Alleyoop program starts at $5,250/mo, data, technology, and management included, and books qualified meetings in weeks 3 to 4, with no per-meeting commission.
The proof: Alleyoop booked 10,000+ qualified meetings as ZoomInfo’s outbound arm while they scaled from 50 to 3,500 people, plus programs for Adobe, AWS, Srixon and ACV Auctions.
| In-house SDR team | Alleyoop program | |
|---|---|---|
| Year-one cost | ~$154K per seat fully loaded, before the manager and the data stack. | $5,250, $14,750/mo flat, six-month terms. Data, tooling, management included. |
| Time to first qualified meeting | Typically 4 to 7 months: hire, ramp, assemble the stack. | Weeks 3 to 4. Live in under 30 days. |
| Turnover risk | ~34–40% a year. The good ones get promoted or poached; you re-hire and re-ramp. | Ours to manage. Your program doesn't pause for a resignation. |
| Management | A sales manager's salary, or a sales leader's nights and weekends. | A program lead included, with a standing weekly call. |
| Targeting | Whatever data you buy, worked top to bottom. | Interest-first: signs of buying, named website visitors, and a map of who decides all shape who gets called. |
| Marketing warm-up | A separate marketing function, separately budgeted. | Under the same roof, companies are warmed before the first contact. |
| Scaling up or down | A hiring cycle in one direction; layoffs in the other. | A program-tier conversation. |
Free tool · Built for your finance team
The CFO Cost Model prices your exact scenario (seats, ramp, turnover, tooling, management) in-house vs. program, side by side. Bring the output to your build-vs-buy conversation.
We'd rather lose the deal than pretend this list is empty. Build in-house if: sales development is strategically core to how you win; you already have a strong SDR manager and a recruiting engine; your motion needs deep product fluency that takes months to teach; and you have committed, multi-year budget that survives a bad quarter.
If you read that list and nodded four times, hire the team, and we mean that. If you nodded once or twice, you're describing a two-year, seven-figure project to become mediocre at someone else's specialty. That's the tuition most companies pay before they call us.
About $154K a year per seat fully loaded, salary, benefits, data, tooling, and a share of management, before the 3 to 6 month ramp and the 34–40% turnover that forces you to re-hire and re-ramp. Most teams price the role at the offer letter and discover the rest in the P&L. Run your own numbers →
You can, and when you do, you leave with everything we built: the playbooks, the call recordings, the data, and the trained intelligence from your market. That's the High IQ Exit, and it's a feature, not a penalty. Most clients stay anyway, not because leaving is hard, but because the system keeps compounding: every month adds more signal about who's ready to buy, which accounts are warm, and who actually decides.
Yes, and it's common at scale: the program covers brand-new cold outreach while your internal reps work inbound, expansion, and key accounts. The mistake is splitting the same motion across both, two teams calling the same accounts with different data is how sequences collide.
Twenty minutes, your numbers, and a straight answer on whether a program beats the seat. If building is right for you, we'll say so.
The assist is ours. The win is yours.